Getting Your First 10 Customers

You have a product. Maybe a prototype. You have zero customers.

You have spent months building and raised some funding. Now you need proof that someone will pay. Investors want revenue. You want validation. Your runway is burning.

You have tried the obvious things. They are not working. You are spending money on tactics that cannot work at your stage, and the clock keeps ticking.

---

Why Current Approaches Fail

AI Outreach Tools (Apollo, Lemlist, Instantly, Clay)

You heard you could "scale personalisation." You bought Apollo. Built sequences. Uploaded 5,000 contacts. Sent clever emails with merge fields and AI-generated research.

Result: near-zero meetings.

Here is what the data shows. Apollo's actual email accuracy is approximately 73%, not the 95%+ they claim. That means 15 to 27% of your "verified" contacts will bounce. Users report shared tracking domains destroy sender reputation. The average cold email reply rate dropped to 5.1% in 2024, down from 7% the year before. That is for experienced teams with validated messaging.

The core failure: AI outreach at pre-PMF is scaling a message you have not validated. The algorithm cannot find your ICP because you do not know your ICP. You are optimising for volume when you should be optimising for learning. Every automated email that fails teaches you nothing because you were not there to hear the rejection.

Hired SDRs (Upwork, Agencies, Fractional)

You thought: "Let me focus on product while someone else does sales." You hired a part-time SDR or engaged an agency.

Result: they quit or you fired them. Still no pipeline.

The data is unforgiving. Average SDR ramp time is 3.2 months according to Bridge Group's 2024 report. SDR quota attainment across the industry is only 63 to 68% according to Tenbound's 2024 data. Average SDR tenure is 18 months. The true first-year cost, including management and training overhead, adds £27,000+ beyond base salary.

The core failure: SDRs cannot sell what the founder cannot sell. They are executing a playbook that does not exist. You have no documented process, no validated messaging, no proven ICP. Even with a process, 63 to 68% of SDRs fail to hit quota. Without one, the failure rate approaches 100%.

Boosted Posts and Paid Ads

You spent £500 on LinkedIn ads. Or Meta. Or Google. You boosted some posts. Impressions went up.

Result: impressions up, revenue at zero.

The core failure: boosted posts without a conversion mechanism is paying for attention you cannot convert. Awareness without a sales motion is vanity spend. At zero revenue, you do not need brand awareness. You need transactions.

---

The Unlock

Your first customers do not exist as customers until you create them.

They are not searching for you. They are not comparing solutions on G2. They are not "in the market." They are running their businesses, tolerating their problems, and spending their budgets elsewhere.

Your job is to interrupt that pattern. To surface a pain they have learned to ignore. To quantify a cost they have accepted as normal.

Hunter.io analysed 11 million cold emails in 2024. Campaigns with 50 recipients or fewer achieved a 5.8% reply rate. Campaigns with 1,000+ recipients achieved 2.1%. That is a 2.76x performance gap.

The insight: smaller, founder-led, highly targeted outreach dramatically outperforms scaled automation. Not because technology is bad. Because you cannot automate what you have not proven manually.

This is what I call The Delegation Paradox. You cannot delegate learning. You can only delegate execution of a proven process. At zero customers, you do not have a proven process. Every attempt to shortcut this reality extends your time to revenue.

Race Capital advises their portfolio: "First 20 customers must be sold and closed by the founders." Pete Kazanjy, author of Founding Sales: "Founders should be their own first salesperson."

The founders who wait for inbound, who hire salespeople too early, who hide behind "building product" do not make it to £100k ARR.

---

The Tactic

The Manual Sales Laboratory has four components that work together.

1. The ICP Statement

Before you send a single email, you must complete this sentence (see below). If you cannot fill in every blank with confidence, you are not ready to do outreach. You are guessing.

This statement becomes your Sales Navigator filter. Your email hook. Your close. Every word does work.

2. Volume with Documentation

100 outreach attempts per week minimum. Every response documented. Every rejection analysed. Every meeting recorded in your spreadsheet.

The maths is unforgiving: 100 emails produce approximately 10 responses produce 3 meetings produce 1 customer. Ten customers requires 1,000 outreach attempts. This is normal. This is the work.

3. Weekly Iteration

Your pitch should change every week based on what you learned. If your email in week 4 looks like your email in week 1, you are not running a laboratory. You are hoping.

Review your data every Friday. What objections appeared? What language resonated? What triggered urgency? Rewrite your approach for Monday.

4. The Founder Sends the Emails

Non-negotiable. You cannot delegate learning. You can only delegate execution of a proven process. You do not have one yet.

Every objection you hear refines your positioning. Every no teaches you something. Every conversation is data that no one else can gather for you.

---

The Formula

The ICP Statement:

For [user_description] who experience [current_pain],
my product delivers [outcome] by [mechanism].

How each element works:

Element	What It Becomes	Example
user_description	Your Sales Navigator filter	"Heads of Finance at Series B+ startups"
current_pain	Your relevance in line 1 of the email	"audit documentation gaps from manual approvals"
outcome	What you promise	"eliminates audit findings"
mechanism	How you deliver it	"automated approval audit trails"

The Email Template:

Subject: [Company] + [pain_shorthand]

Hi [Name],

[Trigger event observation: one sentence showing you know their situation]

[Pain articulation: specific problem with quantified cost if possible]

[Offer: what you can do, positioned as diagnostic not pitch]

[Ask: 15 minutes, specific day]

[Your name]

---

Worked Example

The Company: Workflow automation platform. Pre-seed. Two founders. Four months building. Zero customers.

Initial Hypothesis: "Operations Directors need to automate approval workflows to save time."

Week 1-2 Results:

150 cold emails to Operations Directors at Series B+ startups.

12 responses. 4 meetings. 0 closes.

Learning: Operations Directors do not own budget for this. Common objection: "Interesting but not my call."

The Pivot:

Target Heads of Finance instead.

Revised ICP Statement:

For Heads of Finance at Series B+ startups who experience
audit documentation gaps from manual approval workflows,
my product eliminates audit findings by creating
automated approval audit trails.

Week 3-4 Email:

Subject: [Company] + the approval workflow problem

Hi Sarah,

Noticed you completed SOC 2 certification last quarter.

Curious if approval documentation was a pain point during the
audit. Seeing Heads of Finance at Series B companies lose 10+
hours prepping evidence that should be automated.

Worth 15 mins to see if we can eliminate that before your
next audit cycle?

James

What makes this email work:

The subject line contains a trigger event (SOC 2 certification) and a pain shorthand (approval workflow problem). The first line demonstrates specific knowledge of their situation. The second paragraph articulates pain with a quantified cost (10+ hours). The ask is low friction (15 mins) with a specific benefit (eliminate before next audit).

Week 3-4 Results:

120 emails to Heads of Finance.

18 responses. 8 meetings. 2 closes (£6k total).

Learning: the pain that converts is "audit compliance," not "time savings." Heads of Finance care about audit risk. Operations Directors care about efficiency. Same product, different buyer, different pain.

Week 5-8 Results:

200 emails with refined positioning around audit compliance.

14 meetings. 6 closes (£28k total).

Final Outcome: 8 paying customers. £34k total contract value. Validated ICP. Documented sales process ready for iteration.

Total spend: zero pounds. Founder time only.

---

Why This Works

1. You are the trust signal

At customer zero, you have no brand. No reviews. No case studies. No logos on your website. Buyers are not buying your product. They are buying your credibility, commitment, and competence. Only the founder can provide that.

A hired rep is an intermediary. You are the authority. When the founder shows up, it signals this prospect matters. It signals the company is real. It signals problems will get solved.

2. Learning requires presence

Every conversation is an experiment. The goal is not efficiency. The goal is learning. What objections appear? What language resonates? What triggers urgency? What makes them lean forward versus lean back?

You cannot gather this data at a distance. When you delegate outreach before you have a process, you delegate the learning. You slow yourself down while believing you are speeding up.

3. Small batches outperform at your stage

Hunter.io data: 50-recipient campaigns get 2.76x higher reply rates than 1,000-recipient campaigns. This is not magic. It is relevance.

Smaller batches force you to be specific. Specificity creates resonance. Resonance creates replies. You cannot be specific about a persona you do not understand. The understanding comes from the work.

---

Common Failures

Failure: "I sent 50 emails and nothing worked"

Fifty is not enough data. The maths says 100 emails produces 1 customer on average. You need at least 100 attempts before you have signal. Most founders give up at 30 and conclude "outbound does not work." The conclusion is premature. The sample size is inadequate. Keep going.

Failure: Changing too many variables at once

You change the subject line, the pain statement, the CTA, and the target persona in the same week. Something works better. You do not know what. You have learned nothing actionable.

Change one variable per week. Document the impact. Run a laboratory, not a lottery.

Failure: Not documenting rejections

A "no" is data. Why did they say no? Wrong persona? Wrong pain? Wrong timing? Budget constraints? Political dynamics? Already using a competitor?

If you cannot answer this question for every rejection, you are wasting the most valuable information you have. The rejections teach you more than the yeses.

Failure: Outsourcing before you have a process

"I'll hire someone to do outbound while I focus on product."

If you cannot close customers yourself, no one else can. Hiring salespeople into a pre-PMF company is hiring them to fail. SDR ramp time is 3.2 months. SDR quota attainment is 63 to 68%. You are paying for someone to fail slowly while you burn runway.

The Delegation Paradox: you cannot delegate learning. You can only delegate execution of a proven process. Build the process first.

Failure: Generic "personalisation"

"I noticed [company] is growing fast."

This is not personalisation. It could apply to any company. Personalisation is demonstrating you understand their specific situation. Trigger events. Recent announcements. Role-specific pain. Sector-specific challenges.

If your "personalisation" could apply to 100 companies, it is not personalisation. It is a template with a merge field.

---

Next Tactic

Once you have 5 to 10 customers from founder-led sales, the next challenge is documenting what you learned so it can be repeated. The process that exists in your head needs to exist on paper before anyone else can execute it.

Next: The Sales Extraction Audit: How to Pull the Sales Process Out of the Founder's Head

---

Full methodology: The Zero Dollar Customer Problem